Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 18:54:06 GMT -10
It shows concrete results such as the decrease in homicides the recovery of various public spaces and the reduced presence of gangs which impacts the reduction of crimes that occur in places of life and work. Especially in the most popular neighborhoods of El Salvador it is undeniable that the quality of life of the population has changed substantially. But this change also includes the massive arrests of young people without any apparent flagrancy criteria the longterm detentions of people who do not have specific complaints and the complaints of human rights violations that occur in the main penitentiary detention centers. And to this must be added the persecution of nongovernmental media the use of social networks to deliver biased information and discretionary administrative decisions.
The strengths of the socalled Bukele model are built mainly on the feeling there are no other possible alternatives that can bring quick and beneficial results on the accumulation of failed experiences or the generalized Russia Mobile Number List of fear and impunity. But are the mass incarceration of youth and the indiscriminate use of state force actually the solution to crime If so probably the heavyhanded experiences previously implemented in El Salvador would have brought sustained results in the long term beyond the complexity of criminal structures and the sophistication of illegal markets
Despite declining homicide rates the normalization of state violence and discretion in political decisionmaking is bad news for Latin American democracies. There are serious and solid ways to limit violence and control crime the same ones that have been implemented in various countries around the world without this involving the erosion of the principles of the rule of law or the mass incarceration of young people who become hostages of conditions of violence. for democracies facing high levels of citizen insecurity and the consolidation of multiple illegal markets is that avoiding the path of state violence requires a change in the way security policies are designed and implemented. that the efforts have been significant but limited that the responses have been insufficient and that the politicization of an issue as fundamental as security is not allowing the development of serious and longterm policies.
The strengths of the socalled Bukele model are built mainly on the feeling there are no other possible alternatives that can bring quick and beneficial results on the accumulation of failed experiences or the generalized Russia Mobile Number List of fear and impunity. But are the mass incarceration of youth and the indiscriminate use of state force actually the solution to crime If so probably the heavyhanded experiences previously implemented in El Salvador would have brought sustained results in the long term beyond the complexity of criminal structures and the sophistication of illegal markets
Despite declining homicide rates the normalization of state violence and discretion in political decisionmaking is bad news for Latin American democracies. There are serious and solid ways to limit violence and control crime the same ones that have been implemented in various countries around the world without this involving the erosion of the principles of the rule of law or the mass incarceration of young people who become hostages of conditions of violence. for democracies facing high levels of citizen insecurity and the consolidation of multiple illegal markets is that avoiding the path of state violence requires a change in the way security policies are designed and implemented. that the efforts have been significant but limited that the responses have been insufficient and that the politicization of an issue as fundamental as security is not allowing the development of serious and longterm policies.